AI Music Startups Admit To Using Copyrighted Music
In our recent blog post, we discussed the ongoing legal battles faced by AI music startups, particularly concerning copyright infringement claims. This issue has intensified, impacting the future landscape of AI-generated music. A key player in this matter, Suno, has recently fired back against the lawsuits filed by major record labels including Sony Music, Universal Music Group, and Warner Music Group.
What Happened?
Five weeks ago, the big record labels sued AI music companies Suno and Udio. They claimed that these startups used copyrighted music to train their AI models without permission. This means the startups are accused of breaking copyright laws. The case has gained a lot of attention because it could affect the entire AI music industry.
Photo Credit: The Observer
Among the copyrighted tracks allegedly used by the AI programs is Mariah Carey’s All I Want for Christmas Is You. The record labels demand that Suno and Udio acknowledge mining their music libraries without permission and request the courts to prohibit these AI companies from using their copyrighted material in the future. The plaintiffs are also seeking damages for copyright infringement.
Suno’s Response
Suno admitted that they used copyrighted music to train their AI but said it was legal under the fair use doctrine. Fair use is a rule that allows limited use of copyrighted material without needing permission from the copyright owner. Suno argues that their AI models don’t copy the original music but instead create new, original songs. They believe this makes their use of copyrighted music legal.
Suno hired a top law firm, Latham & Watkins, to defend them. Their lawyers claim that the big record labels are trying to avoid having to compete with others. They believe the labels prefer to maintain their dominant position without facing new rivals. They also argue that the labels see AI music as a threat to their market share.
Why It Matters
The outcome of this lawsuit is crucial for the future of AI in music. If the court sides with the AI startups, it could open the door for more use of AI in creating music. This could make it easier and cheaper for new artists to produce music. On the other hand, if the court sides with the record labels, it might lead to stricter rules on using copyrighted material, which could limit innovation in AI music.
The Fair Use Argument
Suno’s main defense is that their use of copyrighted music is covered by fair use. They say their AI models don’t simply copy the original songs but learn from them to create new music. This difference is important and could influence the court’s decision.
Conclusion
The legal battle between AI music startups and major record labels is a significant moment for the music industry. The decisions made in this case will determine how AI can be used in music creation. Suno’s defense challenges traditional views on copyright and could redefine what is allowed in terms of using existing music to train AI.
As this case unfolds, it will be important to see how the court balances protecting copyright with encouraging innovation. This case highlights the tension between keeping intellectual property safe and allowing new technology to grow. We will continue to follow this story and provide updates as it develops.
Sources
Let’s Collaborate!
Need help building the tone for your production? Hit us up – the Rareform Audio team would love to help you create the perfect soundtrack that speaks to your audience and enhances the power of your visual storytelling to new heights!
Rareform Highlights
