The Music Industry’s AI Battle Enters a Critical Phase
The global music industry is stepping up efforts to counter the unauthorized use of its content by generative AI tools. From deepfakes circulating online to the unlicensed training of AI models, the industry is fighting back on legal, technological, and legislative fronts — but progress has been limited.
Sony Music recently reported that it has flagged over 75,000 pieces of AI-generated content for removal. These include deepfake tracks and videos that convincingly imitate real artists, further highlighting the scale of the issue. Despite detection tools and ongoing monitoring, fake content remains widely accessible on platforms like YouTube and Spotify.
Detection Efforts from Tech Platforms
Technology companies have begun implementing AI detection tools, but the results are mixed. According to voice security company Pindrop, AI-generated songs typically exhibit irregularities in frequency and rhythm, making them identifiable. However, these telltale signs haven't stopped a flood of fakes from appearing online.
Streaming platforms are responding. Spotify stated it's actively developing new tools to improve detection of AI-generated music, while YouTube confirmed it is refining its detection systems, with potential updates expected soon.
One analyst noted that digital platforms were quicker to adapt than the music industry itself, which has often been forced into a reactive position. YouTube’s financial stake in maintaining the integrity of its platform is seen as a key driver for its response.
Lawsuits Target AI Training Practices
Beyond the appearance of AI-created content, a deeper issue lies in how generative AI models are developed. Major music labels have initiated lawsuits against companies such as Udio and Suno, alleging these platforms trained their AI tools on copyrighted material without authorization. The case against Udio, filed in New York, accuses the company of using protected recordings to divert listeners and potential licensees. A similar case against Suno is currently pending in Massachusetts.
Both lawsuits are still in early stages, and legal experts point to the complexity surrounding the concept of “fair use” — a legal principle that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission. With courts potentially offering conflicting interpretations, some observers suggest the issue may eventually be addressed by the Supreme Court.
Photo Credit: Mixing Korea
Unclear Legal and Legislative Path Forward
In the legislative arena, results have been modest. While some bills addressing AI and copyright have been introduced in the U.S. Congress, none have advanced significantly. Tennessee has passed legislation to combat deepfakes, largely due to its influential music industry, but most states and countries remain without specific protections.
The UK is currently considering legal reforms that could allow AI developers broader access to online creative content, unless rights holders actively opt out. This proposal has sparked protest from artists, including a silent album release by over 1,000 musicians earlier this year, signaling opposition to such policy shifts.
Industry Fragmentation Remains a Barrier
Analysts observing the ongoing battle note that fragmentation within the music industry itself may be slowing efforts to respond effectively. Without a unified approach, legal and technical solutions remain difficult to implement across the board.
For now, the music industry continues to press forward — in the courts, in tech development, and in the policy arena — but the path to resolution remains uncertain.
Let’s Collaborate!
Need help building the tone for your production? Hit us up – the Rareform Audio team would love to help you create the perfect soundtrack that speaks to your audience and enhances the power of your visual storytelling to new heights!
Rareform Highlights
Join our Spotify Playlist and vibe with us! Featuring an array of tunes our team has been listening to.
